Main » 2015 » March » 29 » Conf. "The illustrator as public intellectual," Rhode Island School of Design, Providence
00:53

Conf. "The illustrator as public intellectual," Rhode Island School of Design, Providence

Rhode Island School of Design, Providence, RI, USA, November 5 - 07, 2015
Deadline: Jun 1, 2015


The Illustrator as Public Intellectual

Keynote Speaker: Rick Poynor
Visiting Professor in Critical Writing in Art & Design at the Royal
College of Art London

Email 300-word abstracts to irsymposium@risd.edu by Monday, 1 June 2015.

Illustrators and all who study their work have long understood the
importance of pictures to communicate ideas and shape opinion, and to
possibly provoke the viewer in unpredictable ways. What should
illustrators say in the public sphere? What forces limit the
illustrator’s expression of thought? What are the key issues and
debates around the communication of ideas through illustration?

Organized and hosted by the Illustration Research Network and RISD
Illustration, the 6th annual International Illustration Research
Symposium invites proposals for papers, panels, round tables, and
visual presentations on the theme of the illustrator as not only
conveyor of established intellectual thought in the public sphere, but
also as a vital, potent voice in public discourse and the author of
content through independent provocation, seduction and persuasion.

The Illustrator as Public Intellectual questions the common
misconceptions that the illustrator’s mind and hand are wholly guided
by editors, art directors, and clients; and that their work is
subordinate to the texts they illustrate. This symposium proposes that
illustrators are empowered as originators and purveyors of unique
thought.

The visual languages of the illustrator not only translate content,
they transform it, indelibly inscribing ideas with force and conviction
at the intersection of visual and verbal thinking. And yet, public
exposition is dogged by inevitable challenges, including balancing
profundity and accessibility, intention and misinterpretation. Papers
may embrace or reject the concept of the public intellectual, while
addressing relationships between communicative intention and audience
reception.

The definition of illustration is open to wide interpretation by
participants, but as a general guideline illustration may be
provisionally defined as fabricated images primarily created to
elucidate and communicate an idea, narrative, mood, information, and/or
opinion through publication. Studies on the illustration of any era or
place are welcome.

300-word proposals for 20-minute academic papers and practice-based
presentations are invited, and may address the following questions, or
others that the presenter feels are warranted:

Studio Practices

• How do different forms, techniques, and materials affect attitudes,
feelings, ideas and the legitimacy of messages?

• How is “thought” manifested in an illustration—how do creative and
visual thinking processes comprise unique forms of cognition?

• What is the relationship between the canon of intellectual thought
and illustrators’ methodologies?

• In what ways does an image embody a philosophy?

• What emerging technologies might further or hamper
the intellectual reach of
illustration?

Public Sphere

• How do ethics and social responsibility impinge upon illustrators?

• If an audience misinterprets an illustrator’s intentions, is the
audience’s reading valid?

• What happens when the interests of the intended audience are at odds
with the interests of a wider audience?

• What is the impact of technologies of dissemination, old and new, on
audiences, creators, and messages?

Creative and Intellectual Communities

• When, where, and how do illustrators participate in important
political, social, and intellectual debates?

• What is the intellectual
community of illustrators and what challenges do they face,
particularly in educating
illustration students?

• Can intellectual partnerships between illustrator, designer, author,
and/or publisher exist?

• What is the appropriate balance between an illustrator’s personal
satisfaction and the client’s wishes, and what is at stake when a clash
occurs?

• What are future directions for the field of practice as a forum for
public intellectual discourse?

Email 300-word abstracts to irsymposium@risd.edu by
Monday, 1 June 2015.

Proposals are blind peer-reviewed. Selected papers and presentations
will be considered for publication in forthcoming issues of the peer
reviewed Journal of Illustration.
Категория: Conference | Просмотров: 553 | Добавил: Admin | Рейтинг: 0.0/0
Всего комментариев: 0
ComForm">
avatar